Featured Image is Droid Market by Cristi Balanescu
Playtesting or Will this Hold Up to Actual People Playing
Last night I had my first playtest for Project Recreo. First off thank you so much to my friends who were willing to take a risk and try something new that’s coming out of my head!
This playtest had me as the GM, and 3 players. I gave a brief synopsis of the world and the heritages (based heavily on this blog post), then presented 6 pre-generated character sheets (based off the characters developed in these two posts – here and here) that the players were able to choose from. The players chose the AI Walking Computer, the BE Companion, and the Evoluu Shaman.
What was really wonderful is how quickly the 3 players got into the game. As I was explaining the setting, the heritages, and the rules many questions and ideas were being thrown out. I’m glad I took notes because sometimes I had ideas coming two and three at a time. The character backgrounds the players came up with were great. We had an Evoluu Shaman who had plant-based mutations and was a lazy hippy type character, a BE Companion who wasn’t really smart but very attractive and had an illegal marriage to a high ranking military officer, and a sarcastic AI that held military secrets that they were willing to blackmail people with. It was great to hear their stories and concepts.
We even got a little time to start a scenario (not finish). It took almost 2 hours just to get through rules and character sheet explaining, but that gave us about 1 hour to do some playing. So I setup that players were a crew that took less-than-legal jobs from their handler named The Slug. The Slug sent them to steal a package on a land-train (think a really long armored accordion bus) heading from the arcology (think Judge Dredd style mega-city tower) they live in, to a mining outpost. The players got into it. The BE tried to seduce the person who the packaged belonged to, the Evoluu tried to sneak to the baggage car but failed their Espionage draw with a negative side-effect and attracted the focused attention of one of the land train stewards, and the AI tried to cleanup the mess the other two characters were making! It was awesome!
I got to introduce all the elements; deck of cards, character sheets, and the tokens. We did everything but get into combat, so we didn’t get to use the Action Tokens (I think I’m going to rename them Combat Tokens, so not to confuse people) and Wound Tokens.
Things that I learned and will be changing (thank you Darren, Elise, and Jess):
- Setting the Target number at 10 for untrained actions was too difficult. I got this feedback from some online readers, but wanted to see it in action to verify if they were right. And they were right. So I’m going to test dropping the base Target number to 9 in the next playtest to see how that works.
- Changing the base Abilities to be called Mind, Body, Spirit, rather than Mental, Physical, Spiritual. Be nouns rather than adjectives.
- To not play into the traditional binary definition of angels and demons, I.e. demons are black and have bat wings, and angels are white and have bird wings. I need to think more about this, but I appreciate the push-back from the players.
- To think about possible mutations for Evoluu as not just fauna mutations but also flora. One of the players had a great idea that their character would have plant based hair and could whip people with it like vines.
- Limitations on the number of Power Tokens a player can collect for their character. Initially setting the limit to 1 of each, but I’m playing with the idea of tying it to an Ability or Aspect.
- Shuffling the deck after each action. Yes multiple people expressed this when reading my initial proposal of the deck of cards mechanic. I was again resistant to this feedback but then seeing it in playtesting, saw that this route is probably best.
- Being able to aid another player in an action. I had not yet considered this possibility and one of the players asked if it was possible. I said yes that should be possible so we then discussed how it could be handled. We decided on an aiding player being able to flip cards equal to their level of shared skill (1 for basic, 2 for advanced) and allowing the primary player to add those cards to their hand if they want. I’m still iffy on if this is the right way to do it, but I’m open to see how it works in playtesting.
- Consider adding a universal thing that the Power tokens can be used for. Let a Power token always be used to decrease the target number by one.*
We also had some discussions about combat but didn’t really get to test them.
- The Action (Combat) Tokens got a lot of discussion.
- There was push back on GM actions not requiring draws, and how players should be allowed to react to those.
- Potentially always allowing characters to be able to make unskilled reactions, even if they are out of tokens.
- Maybe a Power token can be used for taking an additional Reaction action in Combat.*
I reflected at the end, that teaching both brand new rules and setting from the ground up was tough. It takes a lot more work than just doing one or the other. I realized I’m usually assuming that all the players know the rules system and I’m just presenting the setting. Teaching something coming out of my head and not out of a written work is also difficult because no one else at the table has studied the material like I have. So collaboration of teaching is harder.
Thank you again to my playtesters and I look forward to the next chance to try out more and institute some the changes suggested here!
*Edit – Added to the post at 1pm on 12/14/2018.*